RE: @steemcleaners and @spaminator gone rogue - $11,000 per annum

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

@steemcleaners and @spaminator gone rogue - $11,000 per annum

in hive-108572 •  4 years ago  (edited)

LOL. The hypocrisy. Complains other accounts are making money from spam comments. Proceeds to do the same.

image.png

Pockets boatloads of cash over it from unsuspecting donors.

image.png

If you were sincerely trying to do something, you wouldn't personally benefit from this. You'd burn the rewards or turn them off altogether so the everything goes back to the reward pool. If you need people to contribute, request delegations, not upvotes. Big if though. You won't because you want the money. Admit it.

Just admit you're another SCAM and move on.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

You even upvote your own stuff.

image.png

I wondered when you might show up...

The hypocrisy. Complains other accounts are making money from spam comments. Proceeds to do the same.

That's not spamming. That's sharing content which allows people who want to stop plagiarists and spammers from profiting on Steemit. It's commonly known as "a report". 1 per day is not excessive considering the regularity of payouts.

Here is a good example of spamming

Pockets boatloads of cash over it from unsuspecting donors.

If you were sincerely trying to do something, you wouldn't personally benefit from this. You'd burn the rewards or turn them off altogether so the everything goes back to the reward pool. If you need people to contribute, request delegations, not upvotes. Big if though. You won't because you want the money. Admit it.

Can you delegate all of your Steem to help stop plagiarism and spammers please?

Why shouldn't somebody who spends many hours stopping plagiarists and spammers get paid for their efforts? I assume you want your police department to work for free too and donate their wages to charity. I have no shame in admitting that I should get paid for the many, many hours I spend stopping people like you from profiting from their spam and plagiarism. The "boatloads of cash" (a term that is relative and understandable compared to the $8 per day you're spamming away) is insignificant compared to the tens of thousands of dollars that have been prevented from going to plagiarists and spammers.

As for the self-upvoting, you'll see that for a long period after this account was created that there wasn't a single self-upvote. The community recommended that I should self-upvote to increase the Steem and therefore increase my ability to stop plagiarists and spammers like you. Unlike most self-upvoters, I do it after others have upvoted so that I don't take away their curation rewards.

Once you've delegated me your Steem, then you'll have no reason to keep spamming and getting downvoted. Everybody wins.

That's not spamming. That's sharing content which allows people who want to stop plagiarists

You're not going to educate me or gaslight me. The community has gone over this many times in the past. Your definition does not overrule previous precedents. It's spam. Sorry. It goes beyond spam and becomes a ***post by earning you income. Your trying to redefine things does not change the facts.

You're not going to educate me

I'm sure many have tried and failed so I won't indulge you any further.

See you tomorrow 👋

On the contrary. In order for you to succeed, others would have had to fail. That is not the case though.

Can you delegate all of your Steem to help stop plagiarism and spammers please?

I love whataboutism logic. Choose an extreme to discredit a perfectly valid point. LOL. This is how I know I'm right when

  1. They try to redefine things
  2. Try to discredit the premise

Textbook

As for the self-upvoting, you'll see that for a long period after this account was created that there wasn't a single self-upvote.

LOL. I get this one from my kids a lot. "But I haven't lied or stolen in days!"

"long period" is subjective. It automatically invalidates itself.

The community recommended that I should self-upvote to increase the Steem

More redefinition. Actually, this is probably your community which you manage. The same ones that could just as easily delegate. Let's just say the second you earn any income, it automatically invalidates your entire argument against spam. It's essentially starting a non-profit to build homes for the homeless, while pocketing a portion of it to "reinvest" for the sake of building more homes. You have to admit it's not a good look at all. It puts you in exactly the same shoes as those you're trying to fight.

I mean, imagine that @spaminator went through the exact same thing with their community. They had the same people telling them to do this. In the end, where is the difference between them and you? You post the same regular reports. Self voting. You can try and justify all you want. Unless you turn off rewards and start taking delegations instead of self-voting, you're just @spaminator.

After more reflection, taking rewards runs contrary to your purpose again because the whole point of fighting spam is because the rewards pool is being diluted. Downvoting is fine because then that returns rewards to the pool for others, but when you yourself get the upvotes in place of the spammers you just downvoted, all that does is replace the problem. The downvotes end up not returning votes to the reward pool. Instead, the votes go to you which is really doing nothing. Once again, nothing has changed. Yeah, spammers are not getting rewards as heavily as before. Instead, you are and it just makes you another spammer. Actually, if you eventually become threatening enough to spammers, you're not just a spammer anymore, you're a racketeer because it becomes a protection racket.

I suggest you don't waste your time on those who were already kicked out from the community. They are like those beggars which you mostly find in a common society Because every community needs some beggars so they can donate their charity to them.

Prepetuator is one of them, So just chill and focus on your work. He/They doesn't want that you reach your goal and he gets kicked on his a** again.

You have a mute option - may be using it against these types of spammers is better than replying to them because they will keep defending until the admins don't freeze their account but the steemit team has a big heart and they say let them earn pennies so they can buy milk for their kids.

I appreciate your words. It's funny how the criticism comes from those that plagiarise and spam and not from the honest users.

You have a mute option

I feel that using it would be perceived as an admission that I'm doing something wrong. Since I am not, I'm happy for perpetuator to continue spamming this post until his kids steal his phone/keyboard and/or mouse.

More self voting above.