In most cases using bots is not profitable at the moment, because there is too many people, who use their upvoting services and the total SP of the bots is not big enough for all that upvoting requests.
Well i find that strange to be honest because i see big users use voting bots all the time, not just the "noobs". Why would they do that if it was losing them money.
It doesn't make sense to me. I heard a while back it was profitable and you actually made a decent return.The OCDB bot that is currently running offers 150%. $8 and it votes $12 after curation of 25% it leaves you with $9. This bot is different from the rest as it is profit free. Whoever delegates gets the curation shared amongst them.
Unless I am missing something the bots actually cost users at the moment.
I'm using tipu at the moment they promise an upvote return after curation of 105%. I tried it out today and it seems to work. Some other alternatives would be smartmarket or minnowbooster. I don't know which one is most profitable.
To get a return that is profitable for the purchase of a vote you have to get back, 1.38 for every dollar invested in the bot.
1.38 less the 25% curating is approx 1 dollar.
for a .10c vote you want to get back .14c and so on
at that rate you are breaking even, and do no better than to just power up your Steem. you would gain a slight bit by powering up as your vote value would increase that tiny bit too. you can use this vote all week before the bought vote kicks in.
The big votes to bots are generally from people voting to an alt account, they might have a large delegation to that same bot, this means they are getting a return on their vote again as they are part of the delegation team that gets rewarded
View this answer on Musing.io
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
View this answer on Musing.io
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
View this answer on Musing.io
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
View this answer on Musing.io
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
In most cases using bots is not profitable at the moment, because there is too many people, who use their upvoting services and the total SP of the bots is not big enough for all that upvoting requests.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
By that logic, it might be profitable having your own upvote bot since the demand is high and supply to low.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
View this answer on Musing.io
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
View this answer on Musing.io
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Well i find that strange to be honest because i see big users use voting bots all the time, not just the "noobs". Why would they do that if it was losing them money.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
It doesn't make sense to me. I heard a while back it was profitable and you actually made a decent return.The OCDB bot that is currently running offers 150%. $8 and it votes $12 after curation of 25% it leaves you with $9. This bot is different from the rest as it is profit free. Whoever delegates gets the curation shared amongst them.
Unless I am missing something the bots actually cost users at the moment.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
View this answer on Musing.io
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
View this answer on Musing.io
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I'm using tipu at the moment they promise an upvote return after curation of 105%. I tried it out today and it seems to work. Some other alternatives would be smartmarket or minnowbooster. I don't know which one is most profitable.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
okay, you have to do some maths.
To get a return that is profitable for the purchase of a vote you have to get back, 1.38 for every dollar invested in the bot.
1.38 less the 25% curating is approx 1 dollar.
for a .10c vote you want to get back .14c and so on
at that rate you are breaking even, and do no better than to just power up your Steem. you would gain a slight bit by powering up as your vote value would increase that tiny bit too. you can use this vote all week before the bought vote kicks in.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Ok i didn't know that. That would mean using tipu is barely profitable.
Payment used: 1.0 SBD -> upvote value: $1.383 (1.411 SBD)
Why do people use these bots if they are barely profitable?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
The big votes to bots are generally from people voting to an alt account, they might have a large delegation to that same bot, this means they are getting a return on their vote again as they are part of the delegation team that gets rewarded
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
View this answer on Musing.io
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit