It's important for people to do proper due-diligence before they arrive at any conclusions. Peerplays has nothing to do with Peertracks. The whitepaper on Peerplays provides a good background to get a handle on what the project is actually about. The proposal itself does include a conservative projection estimation over 5 years also.
RE: The DAO Reviews Investment in Peerplays DAC
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
The DAO Reviews Investment in Peerplays DAC
hi @datasecuritynode, please check my latest post out. I wrote it to you and the other whales. Maybe you will agree with it :)
https://steemit.com/steemit/@steemitpolitics/6rqxnc-to-the-whales-get-your-head-out-of-your-ass-and-vote-good-content-up-you-are-harming-steemit
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
That was a typo. I meant Peerplays. Either way if Peertracks were to try to integrate or procure money from The DAO I would say the same thing.
I know you might include projections but do you have any number to track current metrics like the sign up rate or the amount of people who expressed interest? Static projects aren't as valuable to me as dynamic projections. I need to know how successful Peerplays currently is and if it's just starting out then I doubt TheDAO or any VC will give it money because it's too competitive.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit