I just read the recent announcement by the Steemit Team regarding the discontinuation of SRs and I can only imagine it was a well deliberated decision. It feels like a natural conclusion, considering how things were already unfolding — with people stepping down, responsibilities overlapping, and perhaps a growing sense of fatigue. Maybe the structure had run its course and maybe it served its purpose in the time it was most needed.
That part I can accept.
But what gives me pause is the simultaneous expansion of Community Curator accounts. On the surface it sounds like a continuation of efforts to decentralize curation and broaden participation but deeper down I wonder: where will the other contributions go now? The ones that aren’t just about choosing which posts to curate but about engaging with the system offering feedback observations ideas and sometimes even calling out inconsistencies.
Because SRs — for all their imperfections — weren’t just reportes. Or were they????
But my understanding of their role was that they served as sounding boards — at least a few of them did. They held a mirror to the system. They could offer support, criticism, and suggestions, sometimes warmly, sometimes assertively — but they genuinely tried to uphold the spirit of community stewardship.
Without that channel, where do those perspectives go? Is there still room for governance input beyond the occasional suggestion in a Discord channel or a comment on a post?
Misuse power??? That’s an unfortunate truth in any system. But there were also those who were sincerely invested. Who observed patterns highlighted unfairness and even motivated quiet members to step up. Who understood the platform’s pulse and offered value not in votes but in voice.
Removing a system that once gave structure to such roles is one thing. Replacing it only with more curation without space for reflection and accountability feels incomplete...
But maybe it’s for the best. Some Most of the reports had become repetitive, almost mechanical. Week after week, the same kind of content, the same format, just ticking boxes. I can only imagine the pressure on the team to reward those posts, whether or not they truly added value every time. That kind of system, over time, becomes a burden — not just for those reading and voting, but also for those writing with genuine intent. It blurs the line between real insight and routine output.
And yet, even knowing all that, I couldn’t stop myself from writing down what I felt. Maybe because beyond the structure and the roles, there were real conversations, real observations, and people who genuinely wanted the best for the platform...
In any case, I truly wish the very best for Steemit Inc. It has become such an integral part of my life. I just want to see it flourish — grow genuinely, authentically, and sustainably.
It’s a space I hold close… and one I’m not ready to let go of. Not yet!
Those are not gone! In fact most of them haven’t worn their „SR name tag“ they once used to for a long time… You yourself give the explanation why between your lines. They are still here, they do the same as they always have, only they have a much clearer conscience... ;-)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
That’s a fair point!
I think that perhaps if these roles hadn’t been used primarily as a tool to secure confirmed votes, we might not have reached this point at all. In many ways, the decision felt inevitable!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Hi Maan, this is a deep topic and a sensitive decision from the Steemit Inc.
Well, even when SR were still active, there were some users that still did this without any channel..., just a comment or post. So, I'm not sure this spot is closed.
Even you as a user can still give your feedback on certain topics or what might seem as an issue in the blog.
However, the new plans sounds like a good adventure that might yield some positive feedbacks.....it's just an experiment.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Absolutely, I agree — there were always users who gave genuine feedback without any official channel or badge, and that space should always remain open. I just felt that when roles start being used more for strategic visibility or vote gain rather than genuine contribution, it clouds the purpose. And that’s exactly what has happened...
Let's hope the new experiment brings positive changes!
🤞
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
It's actually quite simple: there are people who want to make a difference, who want to network, support and get involved. And the others who take what they can get and rest on their laurels that they haven't even earned themselves. Well, these others have had their day. The former simply carry on as usual. They are the true Steem Representatives, and they don't need a title or a reward for that.
Everything will be fine ;-))
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
You’ve summed it up perfectly, it really is that simple. Those who genuinely care will continue to contribute, with or without titles, and at their own pace. The urgency that comes with designated roles and the lure of promised votes can often cloud genuine feedback and other important aspects.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit