TYPO3 v13 Simplified: PAGEVIEW vs FLUIDTEMPLATE Compared

In TYPO3 v13, PAGEVIEW offers a cleaner, faster way to render pages with minimal setup. It stands apart from the long-used FLUIDTEMPLATE, giving developers a simpler alternative. The contrast in TYPO3 v13 pageview vs fluidtemplate reflects TYPO3’s move toward efficiency.

The Role of FLUIDTEMPLATE

FLUIDTEMPLATE has been TYPO3’s main method for rendering pages. It connects templates through TypoScript and uses structured folders for layouts and partials. While flexible, it often involves a lot of manual setup.

PAGEVIEW at a Glance

PAGEVIEW simplifies the process by using fewer configuration steps. It works directly with the site’s settings and automatically locates templates, removing the need for deep TypoScript or complex folder management.

How They Compare

Configuration Style: FLUIDTEMPLATE uses more TypoScript. PAGEVIEW minimizes it.

Folder Setup: FLUIDTEMPLATE relies on strict template paths. PAGEVIEW works with default paths automatically.

Project Use: FLUIDTEMPLATE suits complex or legacy projects. PAGEVIEW is ideal for modern builds that focus on speed and clarity.

Workflow Simplicity: PAGEVIEW makes use of built-in features like ViewHelpers and encourages more readable templates.

Choosing the Right Option

Use FLUIDTEMPLATE when working on custom or existing setups that require full control. Use PAGEVIEW for new projects that benefit from a simplified and faster development process.

Final Overview

PAGEVIEW in TYPO3 v13 offers a streamlined templating approach that reduces setup time. It stands alongside FLUIDTEMPLATE, giving developers the choice between flexibility and simplicity based on their project needs.